Washington DC, remote. Patent prosecution.
From the USPTO to a patent boutique
He was ready to leave the USPTO and become a patent prosecutor. He had significant experience as an examiner, which needed translating for a firm audience. We placed him at an up-and-coming patent boutique that had specifically said it wanted USPTO expertise.
Washington DC, remote. Patent prosecution.
When the firm stopped prioritizing her practice
She was at a large firm that was no longer investing in patent prosecution. Among the firms we put her in front of were an elite boutique and an up-and-comer. She received offers from both. The elite boutique paid market with a generous signing bonus. Then a family member reminded her to go where she was wanted, and she chose the up‑and‑comer.
Chicago. IP litigation. AmLaw 5 to AmLaw 60.
A senior associate with nowhere left to grow
He had excellent experience at his AmLaw 5 firm but could not see the next step. We created options at several firms. Given his seniority it took months to find a strong fit, and the answer turned out to be a litigation-centric firm with a marquee client that needed his expertise as it grew.
Chicago. IP litigation. Boutique to boutique.
Moving cities, and choosing culture over prestige
This midlevel associate was relocating and leaving one of the most renowned IP litigation boutiques in the country. His experience and the clarity of his reason for moving meant the strongest IP practices wanted to interview him. We also put a boutique on his radar where we had watched lawyers stay for more than a decade. He loved the culture, and it fit what he wanted.
Los Angeles. IP litigation. Boutique to AmLaw 20.
A trial lawyer without a technical degree
She had trained at arguably the leading trial boutique in the country and wanted to focus on IP litigation inside a team-centric practice. She was unsure how much demand she would command without a technical degree. Even as a senior litigation associate, she picked up multiple offers. She joined a team that valued her skill at turning technical issues into common-sense stories. An episode of Khurram's Quorum with one of the partners helped her recognize the fit. We negotiated on location.
Houston. Patent prosecution. AmLaw 80 to AmLaw 20.
An engineering background that had gone unused
She saw a chance to put her engineering background to work. Her new firm gave her a class year bump because of the fit it saw in her pre-law-school engineering experience, which that practice group had found scarce.
New York. IP litigation. Boutique to AmLaw 150.
A practice shifting out from under him
This experienced counsel watched his firm move away from tech and toward life sciences patent litigation. Among the firms we raised was a rising patent practice looking for exactly his technical expertise. We negotiated a mid five-figure signing bonus.