Outcomes

What lawyers we work with have gone on to do.

We describe each search the way we describe firms to you during a search, by tier and practice. We leave out names because each lawyer's move is theirs to talk about.

Recent placements

Recent placements included Gibson Dunn, Latham, Quinn Emanuel, Ropes & Gray, Cooley, Orrick, Mayer Brown and DLA Piper, across New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and Dallas.

A few searches in detail

Washington DC, remote. Patent prosecution.

From the USPTO to a patent boutique

He was ready to leave the USPTO and become a patent prosecutor. He had significant experience as an examiner, which needed translating for a firm audience. We placed him at an up-and-coming patent boutique that had specifically said it wanted USPTO expertise.

Washington DC, remote. Patent prosecution.

When the firm stopped prioritizing her practice

She was at a large firm that was no longer investing in patent prosecution. Among the firms we put her in front of were an elite boutique and an up-and-comer. She received offers from both. The elite boutique paid market with a generous signing bonus. Then a family member reminded her to go where she was wanted, and she chose the up‑and‑comer.

Chicago. IP litigation. AmLaw 5 to AmLaw 60.

A senior associate with nowhere left to grow

He had excellent experience at his AmLaw 5 firm but could not see the next step. We created options at several firms. Given his seniority it took months to find a strong fit, and the answer turned out to be a litigation-centric firm with a marquee client that needed his expertise as it grew.

Chicago. IP litigation. Boutique to boutique.

Moving cities, and choosing culture over prestige

This midlevel associate was relocating and leaving one of the most renowned IP litigation boutiques in the country. His experience and the clarity of his reason for moving meant the strongest IP practices wanted to interview him. We also put a boutique on his radar where we had watched lawyers stay for more than a decade. He loved the culture, and it fit what he wanted.

Los Angeles. IP litigation. Boutique to AmLaw 20.

A trial lawyer without a technical degree

She had trained at arguably the leading trial boutique in the country and wanted to focus on IP litigation inside a team-centric practice. She was unsure how much demand she would command without a technical degree. Even as a senior litigation associate, she picked up multiple offers. She joined a team that valued her skill at turning technical issues into common-sense stories. An episode of Khurram's Quorum with one of the partners helped her recognize the fit. We negotiated on location.

Houston. Patent prosecution. AmLaw 80 to AmLaw 20.

An engineering background that had gone unused

She saw a chance to put her engineering background to work. Her new firm gave her a class year bump because of the fit it saw in her pre-law-school engineering experience, which that practice group had found scarce.

New York. IP litigation. Boutique to AmLaw 150.

A practice shifting out from under him

This experienced counsel watched his firm move away from tech and toward life sciences patent litigation. Among the firms we raised was a rising patent practice looking for exactly his technical expertise. We negotiated a mid five-figure signing bonus.

Other moves we have run

  • IP litigation associate at an AmLaw 40 firm to counsel at a boutique. Washington DC. We negotiated title, base compensation, a signing bonus and a non-prorated bonus.
  • IP litigation partner at an AmLaw 50 firm to partner at an AmLaw 30 firm. Chicago.
  • IP litigation partner at an AmLaw 100 firm to IP counsel at an AmLaw 5 firm. Washington DC.
  • Complex commercial litigation associate at an AmLaw 20 firm to appellate litigation associate at an AmLaw 30 firm. Washington DC. We negotiated the practice area.
  • Patent prosecution associate at a boutique to an AmLaw 20 firm. Orange County.
  • IP litigation associate at an AmLaw 50 firm to an AmLaw 20 firm. Washington DC.
  • IP litigation associate at a boutique to counsel at an AmLaw 40 firm. Washington DC, after twelve years with the same team.
  • IP litigation associate at an AmLaw 5 firm to a boutique. Los Angeles.
  • IP litigation associate at a boutique to a general practice firm. New York. We negotiated title, base compensation, a signing bonus and a non-prorated bonus.
  • Antitrust associate at an AmLaw 70 firm to an AmLaw 5 firm. Washington DC. She joined a tech-centric firm building out its antitrust practice.

See what your options are.